Direct versus indirect psychosocial and behavioural interventions to prevent suicide and suicide attempts: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Background: Psychosocial and behavioural interventions that address suicidal thoughts and behaviour during treatment (direct interventions) might be more effective in preventing suicide and suicide attempts than indirect interventions that address symptoms associated with suicidal behaviour only (eg, hopelessness, depression, anxiety, quality of life). To test this hypothesis, we did a systematic review and meta-analysis of psychosocial and behavioural interventions aimed at preventing suicide and suicide attempts.

Methods: For this systematic review and meta-analysis, we searched MEDLINE and PsycINFO from inception to Dec 25, 2015, for randomised controlled trials that reported suicides or suicide attempts as an outcome, irrespective of participants' diagnoses or the publication language. We excluded studies with pharmacological or device-based interventions, those that targeted communities or clinicians, primary prevention trials, and trials that reported events of non-suicidal self-injury as suicide attempts. Trials that had no suicides or suicide attempts in both groups were also excluded. Data were extracted by one investigator and independently verified by a second investigator. We used random-effects models of the odds ratio (OR) based on a pooled measure of suicides and the number of individuals who attempted suicide, immediately post-treatment and at longer-term follow-up.

Findings: Of 2024 unique abstracts screened, 53 articles met eligibility criteria and reported on 44 studies; 31 studies provided post-treatment data with 6658 intervention group participants and 6711 control group participants at baseline, and 29 studies provided follow-up data. The post-treatment difference between direct interventions and indirect interventions did not reach statistical significance at the 0·05 level (OR 0·62 [95% CI 0·45-0·87] vs 0·93 [0·77-1·12], p=0·06) and represented a large effect size (Cohen's d=0·77). At longer-term follow-up, the difference was not significant (OR 0·65 [0·46-0·91] vs 0·82 [0·70-0·96], p=0·25) but still represented a medium effect size (Cohen's d=0·47). These effect sizes emphasise the clinical importance of direct interventions. Post-hoc subgroup and sensitivity analyses showed that our results are robust and unlikely to be notably affected by between-study heterogeneity or publication bias.

Interpretation: Psychosocial and behavioural interventions that directly address suicidal thoughts and behaviour are effective immediately post-treatment and long term, whereas treatments indirectly addressing these components are only effective long term. Moreover, although the differences shown between direct and indirect strategies were non-significant, the difference in favour of direct interventions represented a large post-treatment improvement and medium improvement at longer-term follow-up. On the basis of these findings, clinicians working with patients at risk of suicide should address suicidal thoughts and behaviours with the patient directly. Although direct interventions are effective, they are not sufficient, and additional efforts are needed to further reduce death by suicide and suicide attempts. Continued patient contact might be necessary to retain long-term effectiveness.

Funding: National Institute of Nursing Research.

Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Comment in

Erlangsen A, Nordentoft M. Erlangsen A, et al. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016 Jun;3(6):494-5. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(16)30021-9. Epub 2016 Mar 24. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016. PMID: 27017085 No abstract available.

Similar articles

Nordentoft M. Nordentoft M. Dan Med Bull. 2007 Nov;54(4):306-69. Dan Med Bull. 2007. PMID: 18208680 Review.

Torok M, Han J, Baker S, Werner-Seidler A, Wong I, Larsen ME, Christensen H. Torok M, et al. Lancet Digit Health. 2020 Jan;2(1):e25-e36. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30199-2. Epub 2019 Nov 29. Lancet Digit Health. 2020. PMID: 33328037

Natale P, Palmer SC, Ruospo M, Saglimbene VM, Rabindranath KS, Strippoli GF. Natale P, et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Dec 2;12(12):CD004542. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004542.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019. PMID: 31789430 Free PMC article.

Miguel C, Cecconi J, Harrer M, van Ballegooijen W, Bhattacharya S, Karyotaki E, Cuijpers P, Gentili C, Cristea IA. Miguel C, et al. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024 Apr;11(4):252-261. doi: 10.1016/S2215-0366(24)00027-0. Epub 2024 Feb 27. Lancet Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38428438

Christensen H, Calear AL, Van Spijker B, Gosling J, Petrie K, Donker T, Fenton K. Christensen H, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Mar 25;14:86. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-86. BMC Psychiatry. 2014. PMID: 24661473 Free PMC article. Review.

Cited by

Miché M, Strippoli MF, Preisig M, Lieb R. Miché M, et al. BMC Psychiatry. 2024 Mar 20;24(1):217. doi: 10.1186/s12888-024-05647-w. BMC Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 38509477 Free PMC article.

Reid HE, Pratt D, Edge D, Wittkowski A. Reid HE, et al. Front Psychiatry. 2023 Dec 21;14:1286500. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1286500. eCollection 2023. Front Psychiatry. 2023. PMID: 38179249 Free PMC article.

Choi NG, Marti CN. Choi NG, et al. J Women Aging. 2024 May-Jun;36(3):210-224. doi: 10.1080/08952841.2023.2292164. Epub 2023 Dec 13. J Women Aging. 2024. PMID: 38090746

Büscher R, Sander LB, Nuding M, Baumeister H, Teismann T. Büscher R, et al. JMIR Form Res. 2023 Sep 21;7:e49043. doi: 10.2196/49043. JMIR Form Res. 2023. PMID: 37733414 Free PMC article.

Schmutte T, Olfson M, Xie M, Marcus SC. Schmutte T, et al. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024 Jan;32(1):128-134. doi: 10.1016/j.jagp.2023.08.011. Epub 2023 Aug 22. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2024. PMID: 37690981